segunda-feira, 20 de abril de 2020

Viruses 101: How Overprotecting People from COVID 19 Could Make it More Lethal

Written by Brandon P. Reines












«News over the past few days carried reports that the governor of Michigan has decreed that those living in the state shalt not garden. Governor Gretchen Whitmer ordered that stores could not sell seeds and plants, forcing the closure of garden centers and plant nurseries as non-essential. So much for “victory gardens.”

As a result, some have noted that now in Michigan, you can get an abortion, but you can’t buy a lawnmower.

Whitmer’s headline-grabbing totalitarianism aside, the worldwide shutdown of anything deemed non-essential by know-nothing government bureaucrats is now causing the world to rush toward a catastrophic famine.

There are already millions of newly unemployed people who once lived paycheck to paycheck. They are now lining up for desperately needed supplies from food banks. In one example, already on March 30 the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reported that hundreds of cars had lined up for food at one Pittsburgh-area food bank. “Organizers were prepared to serve 1,700 families, a hundred more than last week when some people were turned away,” the paper reported.

Food itself, however, may become harder to get, as farmers, unable to sell their products, face agricultural catastrophe. Dairy farmers in Wisconsin are dumping thousands of gallons of milk that they can no longer sell. On April 1, the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel reported that one dairy operation, Golden E Dairy, “opened the spigot and started flushing its milk into a wastewater lagoon — 220,000 pounds a day through next Monday.” And it’s not just one dairy farm that is being affected. “I think that a lot of milk will all of a sudden be dumped.” Julie Sweney from FarmFirst Dairy Cooperative told the Journal-Sentinel. “Everyone across the industry is feeling distressed now.”

A significant amount of the product supplied by Wisconsin’s large dairy industry is sold through restaurants and other parts of the food-service trade, much of which has been shut down. Without those markets, suppliers are at risk for business disruption. Other farm products are also facing challenges.

“U.S. farmers have destroyed millions of pounds of perishable food like tomatoes, lettuce and green beans because growers lost a vast number of customers after the coronavirus pandemic struck,” reported Paul Brinkman for the United Press International (UPI) news agency.

“It’s a catastrophe, it really is,” Florida tomato grower Tony DiMare told UPI. “It’s been a disaster at every level — lost crops, lost sales, lost packing inventory,” DiMare said.

Meat producers are also warning of supply disruptions. Smithfield Foods, the largest supplier of pork products in the United States, was forced to close a major facility indefinitely due to coronavirus exposure to employees. According to Smithfield, “The plant is one of the largest pork processing facilities in the U.S., representing four to five percent of U.S. pork production. It supplies nearly 130 million servings of food per week, or about 18 million servings per day.”

In its press release announcing the closure of the plant, the Smithfield’s CEO warned that the country’s food supply situation was growing precarious.

“The closure of this facility, combined with a growing list of other protein plants that have shuttered across our industry, is pushing our country perilously close to the edge in terms of our meat supply,” said Smithfield CEO Kenneth M. Sullivan. “It is impossible to keep our grocery stores stocked if our plants are not running. These facility closures will also have severe, perhaps disastrous, repercussions for many in the supply chain, first and foremost our nation’s livestock farmers. These farmers have nowhere to send their animals.”

Farmers in the United States, as well as agricultural processors, are among the chief suppliers of food to not just the United States and North America, but to the world. U.S. agricultural exports over the last eight years have ranged from $129 billion to as much as $152 billion annually, representing food supplies that feed people around the world. If American farmers, food processors, and agricultural equipment companies are impaired or even forced out of business due to the bureaucratically engineered coronavirus economic depression, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people around the world will be put at risk of hunger and starvation. At best, living standards and general standards of health and welfare will decline significantly.

If this disruption is allowed to continue much longer, the risk of famine and mass death due to starvation increases substantially.»

Dennis Behreandt («If Freedom Isn't Restored, People Will Starve», in The New American, 13 April 2020).


«(...) In reality, the most effective way to prevent convict virus contraction is to keep them “quarantined” in prison. It’s not rocket science: Test the prisoners; separate out, isolate, and treat the sick; test any new convicts before incarceration; eliminate visitation during the outbreak; and test staff every two weeks.

That leftists defy this common sense hints at an agenda, as American Thinker explains: “The far left, including the Soros front groups, Angela Davis, Chesa Boudin, and other extremists, have long advocated for getting rid of prisons and letting their denizens all out to prey upon us, under the tangled rubric of ‘social justice,’ a social justice that always finds itself devoid of [just] laws.”

The site then theorizes about the motives, writing, “The real game of this bunch is more likely to inflict criminals upon law-abiding citizens, the better to restrain their freedoms, which is always their real agenda. If law-abiding citizens can no longer walk about on the streets in any safety (nor use weapons in self-defense, another hobbyhorse of this bunch), we all should be more controllable by the state.”

Put simply, the theory is: Since people will generally sacrifice liberty for security, you can maximize the removal of liberty by first maximizing the removal of security.

Whatever the motive, for certain is that it isn’t only “non-violent” felons being released in the People’s Republic of New York. Consider Vargas: He “has more than a dozen prior arrests for assault, robbery, weapons possession and burglary,” relates the Post, and “had been in state prison on a 2014 burglary conviction until he was released on parole in November 2017, records show.”

Vargas then was rearrested for parole violations and was behind bars until the Love Gov decided to release the miscreant, who, based on his record, was guaranteed to reoffend.

He’s no outlier, either. As the Post reported on Friday, “At the request of the Legal Aid Society, [Democrat] Justice Mark Dwyer freed 18 Rikers Island inmates, including accused murderer Pedro Vinent-Barcia, who allegedly stabbed his girlfriend to death.”

Also released were “some 329 other violent ones, as well 207 ‘non-violent’ felony detainees, probably drug-traffickers, porno perverts, and other social plagues,” the Thinker writes.

“New York in fact has released 1,500 of these thugs from its Rikers Island prison, the hellhole where they take the really thuggy convicts and detainees, a place so bad that it’s used as a threat to force cooperation with prosecutors,” the site continues. “New York’s prosecutors tried to do that to former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort until they got called out for sleaze tactics and were forced to backtrack.”»

Selwyn Duke («Thug Released by Gov. Cuomo Over Covid-19 Concerns Viciously Robs Man», in The New American, 13 April 2020).


See here and here


«A Massachusetts sheriff has slammed a court-ordered release of illegal aliens from detention during the coronavirus crisis, asserting most will simply disappear.

A federal judge has ordered Bristol County Sheriff Thomas Hodgson to free 45 detainees from the Bristol County Jail, where they had been held in cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement – and releases are set to continue on a ‘rolling basis.’

“The question many people ask is, ‘Are they going to turn themselves in after the COVID-19 incident is over?’” Sheriff Hodgson told a panel from the Center for Immigration Studies.

“And the answer is, ‘No, of course not.’”

The decision to releases inmates back onto the street, which mirrors many others being made across the country, is blamed upon the supposed increased potential for incarcerated persons to contract coronavirus.

“Ironically, of my 850 detainees/inmates, we have had no COVID-19 cases since the pandemic began, and this judge is releasing these detainees under a ‘humanitarian’ claim,” Hodgson said.

“I can think of nothing more inhumane than letting dangerous people wander around our neighborhoods, based on a claim that maybe – just maybe – they could contract COVID-19 in the detention center.”

Hodgson said most of the detainees he was ordered to release had criminal histories and were awaiting deportation – however, virtually no restrictions were placed on their movement and no monitoring protocols were established.»

Dan Lyman («Sheriff Blasts Court-Ordered Release of Illegals Due to Coronavirus», NEWSWARS, April 14, 2020).


«Voice of America reports that Turkey’s President Recep Erdogan is planning to send a fresh wave of migrants to Europe, with officials fearing many of them will be infected with coronavirus.

“Greek forces are on heightened alert as reports have surfaced that Turkey is preparing to push through a fresh wave of migrants to Europe. Officials in Athens say, they fear that refugees infected with the coronavirus may be among the new wave of asylum seekers,” reports VOA.

Intelligence has been produced showing how Turkish authorities have moved migrants from inland areas to the shore, where smugglers are waiting to ferry them to Europe.

Greece’s coastguard, Air Force and Navy have stepped up patrols against what they see as another organized effort to unleash thousands of migrants as a political weapon.

Back in February, President Erdogan announced that Turkey would be re-opening its border and encouraging millions of migrants to invade Europe.

During the incursions, Christian churches were trashed and thousands of precious olive trees were chopped down as part of an economic attack.

Thanks to a strong response from Greek security forces and a massive revolt by the Greek people, there has been no repeat of 2015, when up to 2 million migrants eventually reached Europe.

Erdogan initially agreed to hold back the migrant tide in 2016 after the European Union paid Ankara €6 billion, but the Turkish leader is now using the threat of re-opening the floodgates to push for more money and concessions.»

Paul Joseph Watson («REPORT: TURKEY PLANS TO SEND FRESH WAVE OF CORONA-INFECTED MIGRANTS TO EUROPE», in INFOWARS, April 14, 2020).


«The Church of England has moved millions of pounds worth of valuables to the Tower of London in order to protect them should mass looting in London occur during the coronavirus lockdown.

Over the past few weeks, some 400 churches across London have secretly moved items referred to as the ‘church plate’ to the Tower of London and other secure locations. The items moved to the Tower include paintings, art, artefacts, and “rare and unusual” silver.

Churches throughout the country have been closed during the coronavirus pandemic, prompting officials to move the valuables to “ensure their safety, away from our churches, while church buildings remain closed”.

“The focus of the operation has about preserving and protecting heritage, as London’s priests and churches act as stewards of so much of the capital’s rich history,” a Diocese of London spokesman told The Telegraph.

“Not all of the items could be fully valued, because some are so rare and unusual. Even London’s priests do not know the exact locations where items from their churches are being housed for safe-keeping. The authorities, included the police, were informed about the operation and the Diocese ensured that the current social-distancing measures were maintained,” the spokesman added.»

Breitbart («CHURCH OF ENGLAND SENT MILLIONS IN VALUABLES TO THE TOWER OF LONDON OVER CORONAVIRUS LOOTING FEARS», in INFOWARS, April 14, 2020).


«Central bankers at the Federal Reserve are warning Americans that they plan to take action and enslave you for the next 18 months. Neel Kashkari, the head of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, basically said that central bankers own you and they want ultimate control for the next 18 months, according to a report by Market Watch.

Central bankers like Kashkari will decide if and when you can run a business. They will decide what kind of life you’ll live and the will decide that you don’t have any human rights. Kashkari didn’t mince words. He wants Americans to be ready for 18 months of ultimate enslavement and all but said that during a CBS interview on Sunday morning.

The longer we allow these tyrants to lock us in our homes and ban us from making a living, the easier it will be for them to control us. As people lose their sense of security and start living in a constant state of fear, they become pliable and easy to enslave by those who want power over everyone. It’s up to all of us to read between the lines and understand exactly what these totalitarians want, and they want you to be their slave and others to follow orders to force it upon you.

Kashkari spoke of what he thinks lies ahead for the United States economy as the country continues to battle the coronavirus pandemic while destroying the liberty, basic human rights, and financial security of most of the country. We’ve given up our basic human rights to prevent the spread of a disease that’s been hyped up to appear much worse than it is.»

Mac Slavo («CENTRAL BANKERS: WE OWN YOU! PREPARE FOR 13 MONTHS OF SHUTDOWNS», in INFOWARS, April 14, 2020).





«I have already written about the currency reset and other features of a technocratic future waiting in the wings. —New levels of visible surveillance, social credit scores, universal guaranteed income, Internet of Things, energy-use quotas, smart cities.

—Events can move in several directions, going forward. In this article, I explore one of those directions.

The occasion is this fake pandemic; the big hammer is the vaccine against the phony COVID.

As Fauci mentioned a couple of months ago, it could be a DNA vaccine—new technology—which means it is really gene therapy. Synthesized genes are injected into the body. They purportedly set up immunity. Actually, they PERMANENTLY alter the genetic makeup of the recipient.

As you can imagine, this creates the opportunity to put many different genes into humans. To try to invent “new humans.”

The so-called immunity certificates Fauci is now talking about? They would be issued to people who test positive on the new antibody tests for COVID-19—which is an interesting turnaround, because, since 1984, positive tests results have generally been taken to mean “infected.” Why the shift?

Because there is a need for these immunity certificates—as an INTRO to condition the population to an IDEA.

If and when the COVID vaccine arrives, the certificates would be used to signify immunity for all those who take the shot.

It would function as a license. Your passport into the Brave New World. You’re “immune,” so you’re allowed to move out of fear mode. And circulate and travel and enter schools…»

Jon Rappoport («PASSPORT TO THE BRAVE NEW WORLD: THE VACCINE», in INFOWARS, April 14, 2020).


«The World Health Organization blocked doctors from urging countries to impose border controls to stop the spread of coronavirus, it has been revealed.

While the organization was demanding countries impose zero border controls, it was also campaigning against the profiling of international travelers in order to prevent the “stigmatization” of Chinese people (hurt feelings).

We first reported on the WHO telling countries not to impose travel bans back at the end of January, when the organization released a statement urging against “any travel or trade restriction” while demanding countries not engage in “discrimination” in their handling of the coronavirus outbreak.

In early February, Director-General of the World Health Organization Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus re-iterated this in a statement in which he said that travel restrictions “can have the effect of increasing fear and stigma.”

Right up until the end of February, the WHO continued “to advise against the application of travel or trade restrictions to countries experiencing COVID-19 outbreaks,” despite the rapid spread of the disease.

It has now been revealed that medical experts who were urging countries to impose border controls were silenced.

“[WHO] actually decided not to go ahead with [travel ban recommendations] and not declare a global health emergency but there were a few dissenting voices,” reported Sky News Australia.

“So the official meeting records say there was a divergence of views but they won’t actually go into detail about who was trying to block it. But there were doctors there who wanted to issue travel bans and the World Health Organization blocked it.”

The effort to silence medical professionals from urging countries to enact travel bans was made on January 30 during a meeting of WHO bureaucrats and health experts in Geneva, Switzerland.

A Mount Sinai study found that New York City’s record-high coronavirus cases and deaths were “predominately” due to travel from Europe, meaning that many more lives could have been saved if borders had been closed down earlier.

But instead, the WHO insisted that maintaining the globalist principle of the international traffic of people was more important than stopping a global pandemic.»

Paul Joseph Watson («WHO BLOCKED DOCTORS FROM URGING BORDER CONTROLS TO STOP SPREAD OF CORONAVIRUS», in INFOWARS, April 15, 2020).


«Over 100 members of the French parliament have signed a declaration demanding that Prime Minister Edouard Philippe give amnesty to all illegal migrants living in France, claiming the move will help to combat the Wuhan coronavirus.

The letter, which was signed by 104 predominantly left-wing MPs such as Socialist Party member Guillaume Garot, calls for President Emmanuel Macron’s government to emulate Portugal, which moved to give amnesty to illegals on March 28th.

The Portuguese government granted illegal migrants and asylum seekers residency rights so that they could access healthcare during the coronavirus outbreak, but did not specify how many illegals would benefit from the decree.

“We solemnly call on the French government to take the same measures as the Portuguese government. The health catastrophe we are experiencing forces us to act responsibly and without delay, as our Portuguese friends have done,” the French letter, published by Le Journal du Dimanche, states.

The letter argues that amnesty for the illegals will help make sure that migrants without access to healthcare or aid from non-governmental groups will have access to healthcare in case they catch the Chinese virus.

Over the last several years, France has become one of the prime destinations for illegal migrants and asylum seekers, seeing three record-breaking years for asylum claims in a row from 2017 to 2019.

Last year alone, the country saw an estimated 138,000 asylum claims, up from 123,000 the previous year.

The illegal immigrant population within France is estimated in the hundreds of thousands with the no-go suburbs of Paris, the Seine-Saint-Denis area, reportedly having at least 400,000 illegal migrants or 20 per cent of the area’s total population.

According to France Bleu, the Portuguese measures for amnesty are temporary for the duration of the coronavirus crisis. Portugal’s border agency has told AFP: “This is not an automatic regularisation.” It is unclear in the letter signed by the French MPs whether or not their proposal would be temporary as well.»

Chris Tomlinson («French Politicians Call For Illegals Amnesty. Claiming it Would Help Fight Coronavirus», in BREITBART, 15 April 2020).


City of Lisbon, Portugal


Left-wing socialist Eduardo Cabrita







«(...) Undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers in Portugal have been granted the same rights as residents, including access to medical care, during a state of emergency to curb the spread of coronavirus.

(...) Portugal's decision was welcomed on Monday by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights, Dunja Mijatovic.

(…) "In times of crisis, it is a duty for a secure society to ensure that migrants have access to health, stable employment and housing," Portuguese Interior Minister Eduardo Cabrita told local newspaper Publico

AFP («Portugal: Migrants granted residency rights amid COVID-19 pandemic», March 30, 2020).


«Now that numerous virology experts are on record as saying it cannot be dismissed, and multiple government and intelligence sources have confirmed that investigations are underway into the possibility that the coronavirus leaked from an unsafe Wuhan bio-lab and China lied about the true scale of the outbreak, here is a timely reminder of the scores of fake news outlets that for weeks and months dismissed both notions as a ‘baseless conspiracy theories’...»

Steve Watson («FAKE NEWS SITES TOLD YOU DISTRUSTING CHINA OVER CORONAVIRUS WAS 'DANGEROUS'», in INFOWARS, April 16, 2020).


«Despite the coronavirus outbreak, NHS hospital beds in the UK are four times emptier than normal and a newly built hospital in the north-east of England may now never be used.

“Tens of thousands of NHS hospital beds remain unoccupied amid the coronavirus crisis — about four times the normal number — due to huge ongoing efforts to free up space, and a slowdown in admissions from other causes,” reports HSJ.

“Figures from the national NHS operational dashboard, seen by HSJ, show that 40.9 per cent of NHS general acute beds were unoccupied as of the weekend — 37,500 of the total 91,600 relevant beds recorded in the data. That is 4,500 more than the 33,000 the NHS said had been freed up on 27 March, and nearly four times the normal amount of free acute beds at this time of year.”

One of the reasons for the empty hospital beds is that people who would normally go to hospital for treatment are avoiding doing so because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Experts have warned that this could cause more serious illnesses and deaths in the long term.

Another reason is that a lot of patients were discharged last month early in preparation for the coronavirus surge.

Meanwhile, NHS bosses have said that a new Nightingale Hospital built in Tyne and Wear to deal with extra coronavirus patients may now never be needed.

“I don’t think we will need to open,” said Martin Wilson, chief operating officer for Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.

The empty hospital beds will prompt questions as to when the lockdown in the UK will end given that one of the core reasons for imposing it in the first place was to buy time in order to prevent the NHS becoming overwhelmed with patients.»

Paul Joseph Watson («UK: HOSPITAL BEDS FOUR TIMES EMPTIER THAN USUAL», in INFOWARS, April 15, 2020).


«Dramatic political and social decisions are being made across the United States and around the world on what emergency quarantine measures and other steps must be taken. In many cases the radical and severe measures, such as shutting down the world economy, are being justified by COVID-19 case projections of morbidity into the future. If there is one person who is the face of the current strategy of dealing with the coronavirus in Washington it is the Director of the US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH, Dr. Tony Fauci. What major media conveniently leave out in discussing Fauci’s role is his highly controversial and conflicted history since he first joined NIAID in 1984 during the beginnings of the AIDS panic. His role then sheds valuable light on his remarkable and highly controversial actions today.

Tony Fauci, a leading member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force, is being promoted by major US media such as CNN, MSNBC or the New York Times as the great expert on all related to the Covid19 outbreak. He had dismissed the President’s efforts to promote a known malaria medication as treatment for severe corona patients as “anecdotal,” even though seven years before he backed the same drug. He has publicly taken projections from an institute created in Washington State by the Gates Foundation, the same foundation that virtually owns the WHO and owns major stakes in the leading vaccine makers, to claim that up to 200,000 Americans could die from COVID19. Fauci stated that COVID19 is “probably about 10 times more lethal than the seasonal flu,” which would mean 300-600,000 coronavirus deaths this year, at the same time in a respected medical journal he compared Covid-19 as similar to seasonal flu in morbidity. When questioned how long the shutdown of much of the US economy must last, Fauci replied only when there is zero new covid19 positive tested cases, something impossible given the defective testing. He has also backed direct human tests of novel vaccines with no prior animal tests, including with radical non-tested mRNA gene-edited vaccines.

Fauci has more influence over US national policy on the unprecedented Covid-19 pandemic than anyone, including the President. Much of media treats him with awe as an unimpeachable scientist, one of the world’s finest. A closer look at Anthony Fauci’s career gives a starkly different picture, a very alarming one in fact...»

F. William Engdahl («THE REMARKABLE DOCTOR A. FAUCI», in INFOWARS, April 15, 2020).


«—Once again, in this article, I step into the world of official gibberish about the epidemic and the virus and tests and so on. I point out the internal contradictions in the government position. And then I step back and look at what they’re really up to, in the way of a covert operation.

Let’s start with the official word on so-called immunity certificates.

POLITICO, 4/10: “Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, revealed Friday the federal government is considering issuing Americans certificates of immunity from the coronavirus, as the Trump administration works to better identify those who have been infected and restart the U.S. economy in the coming weeks.”

“The proposal is contingent upon the widespread deployment of antibody tests which the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration are in the process of validating in the U.S., Fauci said.”

“Although coronavirus testing thus far has been able to determine if an individual has an active infection, antibody tests report whether an asymptomatic person was previously infected but has since recovered [and is immune], potentially allowing them to return to their jobs.”

Now let’s take that POLITICO article apart.

Immunity certificates would be issued to people who test POSITIVE on an antibody test. Meaning: antibodies in a person’s body are a sign that he has gained immunity from the coronavirus.

But wait. How about this?

Science News, March 27: “Science News spoke with…Charles Cairns, dean of the Drexel University College of Medicine, about how antibody tests work and what are some of the challenges of developing the tests.”

“Cairns: ‘The big question is: Does a positive response for the antibodies mean that person is actively infected, or that they have been infected in the past [and are now immune]…?’”

What??

In other words, when you penetrate an inch below the surface, you find there are even official/mainstream doubts, grave doubts about the meaning of a positive antibody test. It could mean IMMUNE or it could mean INFECTED.


This would be like saying, “The photo either proves there was a sixteen-car wreck on Highway 5 or it was smooth sailing and there was no accident at all.”

Actually, since 1984, a positive antibody test has generally been taken to mean the person is infected, has the disease in question.

So why the sudden turnaround now? Why are Fauci and other government officials claiming that a positive antibody test signals immunity?

Answer: Because, with the widespread use of this simple and quick antibody test (much quicker and easier to perform than the current PCR test), a reason is invented for issuing immunity certificates. And this is what the goal is. Introduce the population to immunity certificates. As a tune-up for the underlying operation, which is:

Immunity certificates for people who eventually receive vaccinations against COVID-19 (and, finally, all vaccines).

Just take the COVID-19 vaccine and you’ll be immune and you can carry with you a certificate, wherever you go—and you WILL be allowed to go here and there and live a normal life. With your paper or digital or tattoo immunity certificate.

Whether the certificate plan will be enacted this time around (COVID-19), or in the next fake pandemic, remains to be seen. But the IDEA is now firmly planted in the public mind. You can win a “gold star” on the blackboard from the teacher—your certificate to a better life. Just obey and follow orders. TAKE THE VACCINE.

Carrot and stick. Be free, or be limited.

If, indeed, we see a COVID-19 vaccine introduced, another variation on this operation would be: “Under Emergency regulations, everyone must take the shot.” But when you do, you’ll get your very valuable certificate of immunity. You’ll win a prize. Isn’t that wonderful?

No. It isn’t.

It’s Corona Bologna.

It’s all about CONTROL.

And in this article, I haven’t discussed questions about what would actually be IN the COVID-19 vaccine. I took up that subject in a recent piece about DNA vaccines. The new DNA technology, if introduced, would PERMANENTLY alter the genetic makeup of the vaccine-recipient.

And meanwhile…don’t you just love the idea of the government first locking you up, and then “freeing” you with an official seal of approval?

“The gate is open for you, sir. You have your papers. But you, sir, you must go back. No papers.”»

Jon Rappoport («IMMUNITY CERTIFICATES: A LOAD OF NONSENSE AND A COVERT OP», in INFOWARS, April 16, 2020).


«(...) Your Tax Dollars at Work


“Both the United States and Canada have sent money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese lab that multiple sources tell Fox News is suspected of being the likely source of the coronavirus pandemic — with the Canadian funding coming as recently as last month," the network’s Tyler Olson reported.

In March, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research announced the expenditure of “millions in funding to research and develop tools such as vaccines and tests to combat the coronavirus,” Olson reported. “One project that got $828,046 from the agency was aimed at developing a rapid coronavirus test ‘using isothermal amplification and CRISPR technology.’ Among the organizations on the project was the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”

Fox picked up the item from Rebel News, a Canadian website.

That’s bad enough. But Fox also reported that the United States contributed funds to the disaster:

According to public documents compiled by the White Coat Waste Project and shared with Fox News, The Wuhan Institute of Virology has been involved with research funded by $7.1 million worth of U.S. government grants from the National Institutes of Health as it has participated in projects in collaboration with U.S. institutions. One grant for research on bat coronaviruses has received $3.7 million and another grant involving injecting viruses into mice's brains got $3.4 million.

It is not clear exactly how much U.S. funding went directly to the Wuhan Institute of Virology because it worked in collaboration with other institutions on the projects funded by the American grants.

The Wuhan Institute of Virology also has official approval from the National Institutes of Health to conduct taxpayer-funded research on animals in what is called “Animal Welfare Assurance” issued by the Public Health Service.


Chinese Coverup 


As The New American reported earlier today, U.S. officials told Fox News that a “patient zero,” who worked at the lab, inadvertently let the bat-borne virus loose and caused the pandemic. To cover it up, the Chinese government blamed bats sold in the wet markets.

The network also noted that Chinese officials knew the virus was spreading as they permitted tourists and revelers to flood Wuhan for six days before the president warned the public about the outbreak.

As for the lab itself, even worse than the tax subsidies are what they subsidized: unqualified lab workers.

On Tuesday, the Post reported that U.S. diplomatic cables “warn[ed] that the lab’s work on bat coronaviruses and their potential human transmission represented a risk of a new SARS-like pandemic.”

The cables worried that a new lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology “has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”

The summary of it all is this: With U.S. and Canadian taxpayer support, unqualified Communist Chinese lab workers were mucking around with SARS-CoV-2 at the lab in Wuhan, one of whom unleashed the virus there. Chinese officials repeatedly lied about the virus: how it leapt from bats to humans, how quickly it was spreading, and how many people it killed. Those lies slowed the U.S. response.

The result? Thousands dead in the United States and abroad, and a national lockdown that has wrecked the U.S. economy, with major losses in the stock market and nearly 23 million unemployment claims since March 1.


Stop the Subsidies 


Representative Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) wants the subsidies stopped. “I’m against funding Chinese research in our country, but I’m sure against funding it in China,” he told Tucker Carlson. “The NIH [National Institutes of Health] gives a $3.7 million grant to the Wuhan Institute of Virology [and] they then advertise that they need coronavirus researchers and following that, coronavirus erupts in Wuhan.”

Said Senator Martha McSally (R-Ariz.), “There is zero doubt that the Chinese communist government has American blood on its hands."»

R. Cort Kirkwood («Report: US., Canadian Taxpayers Subsidize Wuhan Lab Suspected in Viral Outbreak», in The New American, 16 April 2020).


«Facebook has announced that it will begin issuing warnings to users who have clicked on or liked what it deems to be ‘misinformation’ about the coronavirus. The social network will also direct those users to a site where the World Health Organization “lists and debunks virus myths and rumors”, according to the AP.

The report states that “The new notice will be sent to users who have clicked on, reacted to, or commented on posts featuring harmful or false claims about COVID-19 after they have been removed by moderators.”

Facebook is to promote a WHO backed site called “Get The Facts,” where “conspiracy theories” about coronavirus are debunked.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg wrote on his Facebook page Thursday, “Through this crisis, one of my top priorities is making sure that you see accurate and authoritative information across all of our apps.”

The AP report notes that so called ‘fact checkers’ and moderators at Facebook are “up against people’s mistrust of authoritative sources for information, such as the WHO.”

It is hardly surprising that people do not trust the WHO.

For weeks, the organisation parroted the patently false claims of the communist Chinese government regarding the spread of the virus.

Internal Chinese government documents obtained by the Associated Press this week prove that China knew for sure in mid January that the outbreak of coronavirus was a likely pandemic and was highly contagious between humans, yet simultaneously announced, with the backing of the WHO, that there was no “evidence of human-to-human transmission.”

Facebook now faces an even bigger problem with getting users to trust it given that one of its key ‘fact checkers’ was revealed to have worked at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), and has since been placed in charge of debunking articles suggesting that COVID-19 may have leaked from the bio-lab.

This clearly represents a giant conflict of interest, as Zero Hedge reports:

Danielle Anderson, who works at Duke University’s NUS Medical School lab in Singapore, also contributes to Science Feedback – which Facebook has been using to slap “False Information” labels on articles claiming that COVID-19 may have originated at the Wuhan institute – where Anderson worked with bat coronavirus. 

A quick search of Anderson’s publications reveals no fewer than nine collaborations with Dr. Peng Zhou – a Wuhan scientist experimenting on bat coronavirus (the mention of whom may result in a Twitter ban).»

Steve Watson («FACEBOOK TO ISSUE 'WARNINGS' TO USERS WHO HAVE LIKED OR CLICKED ON 'CORONAVIRUS MISINFORMATION'», in INFOWARS, April 17, 2020).





«“While you have been incarcerated at home, discouraged from traveling at all, the US government has flown 1,003 so-called Special Immigrant Visa holders into the US and distributed them around the country,” Refugee Resettlement Watch’s Ann Corcoran reports.

“On March 16th, just as the regular refugee admissions program was about to be shut down (although it wasn’t completely suspended), I made note that we were at 6,867 special refugees from Afghanistan at that point for fiscal year 2020,” Corocan said. “As of April 13th we are at 7,870, a gain of 1,003 in that 4 week period!”

Corcoran stats were directly from the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center.

(…) No doubt Americans will be thrilled to hear the State Department under Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has been flying in Afghans by the planeload and distributing them in towns throughout the country!»

Chris Menahan («WHAT SHUTDOWN? U.S. HAS REPORTEDLY FLOWN IN OVER 1,000 AFGHAN 'REFUGEES' IN LAST FOUR WEEKS», in INFOWARS, April 17, 2020).


«In this time of The Virus, spreading faster than the disease are the restrictions and government trespasses designed to combat it. The latest examples are healthcare workers sharing Wuhan-flu-positive patients’ addresses with the police and a Michigan judge authorizing the arrest of people suspected of harboring the virus if law enforcement deems such action necessary.

Dropping a Dime on the Diseased 


Long considered an imperative in America, medical privacy is going out the window in certain places thanks to virus hysteria. As LifeSite reports:

Health care workers in a handful of American states are sharing with police the addresses of those who test positive for the virus.

So-called “information sharing” is currently underway in Massachusetts, Alabama, Florida, as well as in parts of North Carolina, ABC News reports.

The information sharing is being done in the name of “keeping officers and EMTs safe,” and works by states directing their local health boards to share addresses of those who have tested positive for the virus.

Florida's State Emergency Operations Center recently announced that they are sharing the addresses of positive case coronavirus patients with first responders.

However, as the ABC report notes, concerns have been raised by both health and privacy activists that health agencies sharing information with the police might cause some to forgo getting tested or treated for coronavirus.


Did You Just Blow Your Nose, Sir? 


In one Michigan county, whether or not they have ways of making you talk, they may have ways of making you cough. Regardless, a judge in Kent County has authorized the arrest of those suspected of carrying the Wuhan virus if the police deem it necessary. As LifeSite also reports, in a different piece:

First highlighted by radio host Steve Gruber, Kent County Chief Circuit Judge Mark Trusock’s April 6 order declares that any citizen deemed to be a "carrier and health threat" can be “involuntarily detained by a peace officer, transported to and detained in an Involuntary Isolation Facility selected by the Health Officer for observation, testing, and/or treatment."

The individual could then be held for at least three days to confirm he or she is “without a fever of 100.4 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 72 consecutive hours (without use of fever reducing medication) and/or is otherwise non-symptomatic and meets the CDC criteria for release from isolation."

According to the Great Lakes Justice Center, Trusock based the order on state law that authorizes the confinement of individuals who a “court has reasonable cause to believe” is a public health threat. But whereas that law requires a court to assess specific cases before making an arrest, Trusock gave police and health officials blanket permission to decide who may be a threat.»

Selwyn Duke («Healthcare Workers Give Cops Corona-Positive Patients' Addresses; Judge Says the Infected Can be Arrested», in The New American, 18 April 2020).


«A German medical lawyer who criticized the coronavirus lockdown law was arrested and taken to a psychiatric ward, where she says she was violently abused by authorities.

Beate Bahner published a press release on April 3rd decrying the German lockdown laws as “flagrantly unconstitutional, infringing to an unprecedented extent many of the fundamental rights of citizens.”

“These measures are not justified by the Infection Prevention Act, hurriedly amended just a few days ago,” she asserted. “Long-term restrictions on leaving home and meeting others, based on high-death-rate modelled scenarios, which fail to take account of actual critical expert opinions, and the complete shutdown of businesses and shops with no proof that they pose any risk of infection, are thoroughly unlawful.”

Bahner called for a nationwide protest on Easter Sunday to “end the tyranny at once,” before Heidelberg Police announced that they would seek to prosecute her for inciting Germans to break the law.

On April 13th, Bahner called her sister from Heidelberg’s Klinik fur Allgemeine Psychiatrie describing what happened to her.

After claiming she was “suspiciously” followed by a car, Bahner says she asked another motorist to call the police only for the police to show up, handcuff her and push her to the ground “with massive force.”

After being driven to the psychiatric facility, Bahner says she was treated like a terrorist.

“I asked to be allowed to sit down and was shown to a bench. Then I asked to have the handcuffs taken off, since it was actually I who had requested police protection,” she recounted. “But instead, I was thrown to the floor again, having my head hurled onto the stone floor from a meter height, which nobody reacted to.Then I was forced to spend the night lying on the floor in some high-security Guantanamo psychiatric clinic…there was no toilet, no sink, though they did allow me water, and there was a bell I could ring, though they ignored it after the third time I pressed it.”

The lawyer was charged for incitement yesterday, with her attorney sounding the alarm bell over her treatment.

“I shouldn’t have to add Bahner’s claims of very grave abuse have untoward connotations of the darkest chapters of German history,” he said.

“The mere fact she claimed to have been so badly abused was what prompted me to write to you. Bahner is in the company of over 50 well-known experts in criticising the nationwide lockdown; I would be glad to furnish you with a list of their names. If it really is the case lawyers critical of government measures can now be intimidated using the state legal apparatus or psychiatry, and can be professionally and socially destroyed, then it is five minutes to midnight in this country.”

Bahner has won three cases in the Federal Constitutional Court and written five books on German medical law.»

Paul Joseph Watson («GERMAN LAWYER WHO CRITICIZED LOCKDOWN ARRESTED, TAKEN TO PSYCH WARD», in INFOWARS, April 15, 2020).


«In this exclusive interview hosted by Alex Newman, V.A. Shiva Ayyadurai explains why the prevailing approach to addressing Coronavirus is wrong, and put the outbreak in perspective by looking at the agendas of Big Pharma, mandatory vaccines, and globalist tyranny.»

TNA Video («Power, Control & Profit: Medical Freedom in the Age of Coronavirus», in The New American, 14 April 2020).


«Footage in this compilation was taken from several recent interviews where Bill Gates laughs, snickers and giggles when he mentions vaccines, testing and mass pandemics.

What is so funny?»

Infowars.com («WATCH BILL GATES LAUGH, AND GIGLLE ABOUT VACCINES AND MASS DEATH», April 17, 2020).




Viruses 101: How Overprotecting People from COVID 19 Could Make it More Lethal


With heroic imagination rivalling Don Quixote’s, our hysterical health technocrats are stuck in a time capsule in the middle of World War 1 from which they battle the most terrible pathogen of all time - the original H1N1 flu virus. How else to explain why they have adopted precisely the public health tactics - masking, social distancing, and quarantining - that were used in 1918?

Our wildly anachronistic approach to COVID 19 notwithstanding, we have spent billions for research and know volumes more about viruses and immunity than we did a century ago. The crime is that we the taxpaying public never received a proper education on the subject. I realized that myself 20 years ago when I first read J. R. Paul’s A History of Poliomyelitis. It quietly reveals that almost none of what we have learned in American public schools is even close to the truth.

More importantly, the deep knowledge of viruses garnered from studying both the original H1N1 flu and polio strongly implies that, if we continue to over-react and over-protect people from COVID 19, we risk turning it into a much more lethal virus. In order to understand why I am so concerned about that, first let’s look at how the original flu virus turned into the worst killer the world has ever known, one which not only felled older people and those with weakened immunity, but people in the prime of life including older children and young adults:


1) In general, viruses evolve with their human hosts to get what they need without killing us. Allowing us to survive actually benefits the vírus - they get to survive, too, and get passed to another human host.

2) During WWI, millions of people globally were terrified, malnourished and immuno-suppressed.

3) Soldiers lay in foxholes bleeding, coughing and vomiting on each other.

4) In this chaotic situation, the flu virus could "get away with" becoming extremely lethal and kill the host soldiers - because there were so many of them in close proximity - the virus could spread to another soldier almost as easily from a dead soldier as from a live one.

5) Having millions of people with weakened immunity allowed the flu virus to spread quickly and easily into new populations.


How did the H1N1 monster of 1918 become - evolve into - the relatively meek flu viruses of today? As the human population gradually recovered from WW1, the flu virus had to go back to the safety of peaceful coexistence with its human hosts, and to co-evolving with their immune systems in a way that would allow both species to survive. The real polio story is similar:

Incredibly, from our modern “civilized” standpoint, and as David Shumway Jones recently reminded me, the polio virus was not dangerous until natural herd immunity was disrupted by modern sewerage systems which short-circuited usual fecal-oral natural immunization.

In his seminal book, J. R. Paul explains that polio had probably been living in human intestines for thousands of years, and was mainly a gastrointestinal or GI virus. Only when the human-host-polio-virus balance was “upset” by children no longer putting their feces-contaminated hands in their mouths did polio evolve into a variant that started attacking the spinal cord. Even so, in most families where one child was paralyzed, most had mild flu symptoms and fought it off. It was absolutely necessary to develop good vaccines, based on known natural routes of immunization. But you can't always develop a vaccine, as AIDS has shown, and you need to develop shrewd public health approaches to control new viruses, based on top notch immunological theory. Our current everyone-stay-home approach is anything but enlightened by immunological theory.



See here












Quite the opposite: As billions of people worldwide are currently in their homes, in close confinement, in situations of extreme fear and psychological distress, being told by their governments to go to the grocery store as rarely as possible, we are creating an environment which is more and more conducive for facilitating a virus with enhanced virulence in the future. How are we doing this?


1) Lowering everyone’s resistance to viruses by scaring, stressing, and discouraging them from normal activities including buying food and drink.

2) Keeping everyone at home in effect creates just the immunosuppressive scenario that fosters flu during the winter time - cold, close quarters and stress.

3) Discouraging direct human contact including hugging and kissing, and directly loving one another suppresses immunity. With social distancing, our species never would have made it this far.

4) Preventing young people from being exposed to COVID 19 short circuits “herd immunity.”


In stark contrast to the quixotic fantasies driving our stay-at-home American approach, which sees all new viruses as equally terrifying, British health authorities are taking the more sober approach, one which is solidly based on contemporary virological, immunological and evolutionary biological theory: letting children go to school, to acquire COVID 19 and become naturally immune is absolutely the best way to assure that this new virus learns to peacefully coexist with we human beings. Viruses have always been with us, and are part of our very genomes.

I have met few modern immunologists who believe, as Dr. Fauci does, that washing one’s hands 50 times a day is the best way to stay healthy. At the Ghost lab at the Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology in the 2000s, we often discussed how over-cleanliness and over-protection from viruses and bacteria was a very poor public health approach: too much hand washing actually prevents normal development of the immune system, and leads to autoimmune and other immune-regulatory disturbances later in life. That “hygiene hypothesis” is well known and well accepted by most immunologists. (in American Thinker, April 14, 2020).


See here and here










"The vaccine will be the ultimate game changer in this fight against the coronavirus"

Anthony Fauci






Nenhum comentário:

Postar um comentário