Media lies about Antarctic ice shelf collapsing; the mass has actually gained more ice than it lost

Written by Ethan Huff

If you listen to the global warming fanatics, one of the things they cannot stop talking about is the alleged melting of the Antarctic ice shelf, which they claim is occurring because of cow flatulence and people eating meat. The truth, however, is that the Antarctic ice shelf is growing overall, not shrinking.

Climate change alarmist Greta Thunberg, for example, tweeted that the Antarctic ice shelf, which is “nearly the size of Los Angeles collapsed as temperatures soared to 40 above normal” during a recent heat wave. Thunberg linked to a fake news article from CNN that backs her claim.

Former Mediaite senior columnist and talk radio host John Ziegler quickly put Thunberg and CNN in their place by pointing out that Antarctica just had its coldest winter on record, which was ignored by most major media outlets in favor of the alarmism narrative.

“Climate alarm is based on ambulance-chasing commonplace events, making up fake statistics about them, and never permitting an honest scientist to weigh in on the discussion,” added Tony Heller of Real Climate Science to the conversation.

Antarctica has been cooling and growing more ice for the past 40 years

In a lengthier piece about the subject, Heller wrote that all of the freaking out about the breaking off of the ice shelf is just nonsense meant to scare the uninformed and easily mind-controlled who believe everything the “experts” tell them.

It turns out that eight years ago, the shelf cracked as well, stranding expedition ships amid large blocks of floating ice. There are times when temperatures increase, resulting in breakage, followed by times when temperatures decrease and cause them to reform.

This is how the climate works, by the way: It is an ebb and flow of temperature fluctuations throughout time that cause ice to melt and refreeze, and is nothing of concern.

Listening to the likes of CNN, however, one is led to believe that this most recent ice breakage is a catastrophe that requires the elimination of all fossil fuels and the replacement of all real meat with synthetic alternatives like Beyond Meat, in which billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates holds a large stake.

Heller also challenged the notion that Antarctica’s recent temperature increase can even accurately be described as a heat wave since the temperature increase that occurred there in 2014 was roughly the same.

“So according to climate experts, history began after the year 2014 and the melting point of ice is now -12 C. Icebergs break off East Antarctica regularly,” he wrote.

Another false claim of the climate alarmists is that sea levels will rise because of the ice breakage, which defies basic, high school-level science in every way.

Dr. Brian Galton-Fenzi, a glaciologist, responded to this claim with the following:

“The calving will not directly affect sea level because the ice shelf was already floating, much like an ice cube in a glass of water.”

It really is as simple as that, but apparently the experts at CNN forgot what they learned in high school science class (or perhaps they flunked out?).

In essence, this alleged “climate disaster” in the making is really just climate mitigation, a normal process that is occurring not because of some heat wave, but because of record snowfall.

In actuality, Antarctica has been undergoing 40 years of cooling and ice expansion, despite what the corporate-controlled media and the climate alarmists are claiming.

“Official data reveals that East Antarctica, which covers two thirds of the South Pole, has cooled 2.8C over the past 4 decades, with West Antarctica cooling 1.6C,” reported Climate Depot about this phenomenon.

“It stands that only a tiny slither of Antarctica (the Antarctic Peninsula) has seen any warming – statistically insignificant warming, at that – but there are no prizes for guessing which region the MSM (mainstream media) focuses on.”

The latest news about climate deception can be found at Climate.news.

(In CLIMATEALARMISM.NEWS)

The Dr. Ardis Show: Geoengineering expert Dane Wigington says climate engineering is the single most destructive human activity – Brighteon.TV

Written by Kevin Hughes

Dr. Bryan Ardis discussed the dangers posed by geoengineering or climate engineering during the June 1 episode of “The Dr. Ardis Show” on Brighteon.TV. He was joined in the program by GeoEngineering Watch founder Dane Wigington and Dr. Lee Merritt.

Wigington, a geoengineering expert, said climate engineering is the most destructive human activity of all, and that 70 percent of Earth’s wildlife population has been lost because of it in the past 40 years alone.

In a previous interview, Wigington branded climate engineering as “the crown jewel weapon of the military industrial complex.”

“It can target crops and it can have cognitive effect. We have a decline in IQ in the U.S. alone of six to nine points. That’s staggering,” Wigington said in an interview with InfoWars founder Alex Jones earlier this year.

“This is all madness making us dumber by the day. That’s a scientific statistical fact based on science study on aluminum and its effect on our brain function. Bottom line is: This is an assault from every imaginable direction. If we don’t deal with this hole at the bottom of the boat, the boat’s going to go down.”

Nano particulates are already saturating soils and waters

In the “Dr. Ardis Show,” Wigington pointed out that vapor pressure deficit is already happening in places like California, Spain, Portugal and Australia, where the atmosphere is filled with desiccant particles that absorb all atmospheric relative humidity, affecting crops, trees and all forms of flora. He also noted that the planet already has a disintegrating ozone layer, which is causing the stomata of plants to shut down and affect photosynthesis.

The GeoEngineering Watch founder added that highly toxic particles, such as nano particulates, are already saturating soils and waters. He said all these factors are being overlooked and superficial factors are being blamed for what are actually underlying factors related to climate engineering.

Wigington is also the executive producer of the groundbreaking climate engineering documentary film “The Dimming.”

See here, here, here, here, here, and here

He explained that the term dimming refers to the specific objective of what is called solar radiation management, stratospheric aerosol injection, cloud albedo enhancement and geoengineering. The geoengineering expert explained that all these science terms relate to intentionally spraying light-scattering particles into the atmosphere for the purpose of blocking some of the sun’s incoming thermal energy to slow down a runaway warming event on the planet.

Wigington said there are many layers to climate engineering and they are all malevolent. “It’s a form of weather warfare. It’s a form of deceiving populations as to the true state of the climate. All of it is toxic and is being used for biological warfare,” Wigington said.

There are hundreds of documented cases of the United States military doing open-air biological tests.

According to Wigington, people should know the bigger factors that relate to climate engineering, such as the detoxification of soils and the destruction of the atmosphere that affect photosynthesis and atmospheric chemistry.

“If the planet had been allowed to repair its own damage without detoxification of soils and the destruction of the atmosphere, people would see flourishing northern latitude boreal forests and not dying or burning forests,” he said.

Wigington also cited a new National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) report saying that putting light-scattering particles in the sky was wrong – which was exactly what Geoengineering Watch had warned.

“Large-scale volcanic eruptions and filling the atmosphere with particulates provide only a temporary toxic cooling at the cost of destroying the ozone layer aside from worsening overall warming,” he explained, noting that the Earth has already lost 80 to 90 percent of its terrestrial and aquatic insect population due to climate engineering.

Follow Geoengineering.news for more news about climate engineering.

Watch the full June 1 episode of “The Dr. Ardis Show”. “The Dr. Ardis Show” airs every Wednesday at 10-11 a.m. on Brighteon.TV.

(In WEAPONSTECHNOLOGY.NEWS)

See here, here, here, and here

Now vaccine-pushing scientists want to turn your GROCERIES into mRNA vaccines

Written by Lance D Johnson

 

The global agenda to inoculate every man, woman and child is coming straight to your dinner plate. A team of scientists from the University of California, Riverside are researching ways to turn your GROCERIES into mRNA vaccines. In order to combat “vaccine hesitancy” in the population, these scientists want to distribute coronavirus spike proteins throughout the food supply. This experiment could give rise to a new paradigm of vaccination that gives Big Pharma total control over the food supply, as they venture to genetically alter food to inundate the population with more blood clotting spike proteins.

Is this the reason why GMO/vaccine investor Bill Gates is buying up farmland across the United States? Will all current vaccines and hundreds of future vaccine experiments be carried out through the food supply?

Genetic modification of the food supply could soon be used to vaccinate the population

The future of bio-warfare and human experimentation will likely be carried out through the food supply, and advertised as safe. By altering the cytoplasm of edible plants, scientists hope to introduce foreign spike protein toxins into your food. These vaccine-pimping scientists are already experimenting on lettuce and spinach plants, to develop a new species of greens that can vaccinate people more often and in a less invasive manner. These new designer greens can be grown at home, too. The scientists are working on a way to quantify the correct dosage of spike protein per plant while demonstrating that the plant can replicate enough mRNA to out-perform the current vaccine supply.

“Ideally, a single plant would produce enough mRNA to vaccinate a single person,” Juan Pablo Giraldo, lead researcher and associate professor in UCR’s Department of Botany and Plant Sciences. “We are testing this approach with spinach and lettuce and have long-term goals of people growing it in their own gardens,” he added. “Farmers could also eventually grow entire fields of it.”

Giraldo strives to demonstrate that DNA containing mRNA vaccines can successfully be integrated into plant cells. To do this, the researchers intend to alter the chloroplast of the plant cell. The chloroplast takes in the sun’s energy and converts it to sugar and other molecules that the plant needs in order to grow. The scientists want to interfere with this natural process and instruct the cytoplasm to generate spike proteins and other foreign molecules that can be introduced as antigens into humans.

Giraldo and his team have already demonstrated that the chloroplast is capable of expressing foreign genes that are not part of the plant’s natural design. This genetic modification was accomplished by enclosing foreign genetic material in a protective casing and then inserting it into the plant’s cells. The goal is to introduce these GMOs into humans so their immune system can be programmed to fight antigens and viral sequences that scientists have pre-selected and designed.

Is a new paradigm of food-based vaccines upon us?

At UC San Diego, Nicole Steinmetz has already developed nanotechnologies that can deliver genetic material to the chloroplast of plants. Steinmetz tinkers with plant virus nanoparticles and repurposes them to deliver foreign genes into the plant’s cells.

This is not the only edible vaccine experiment currently underway. Scientists from the University of Ottawa have been working on an edible vaccine for coronaviruses for over a year. The Ottawa Hospital is already testing the first prototype. This edible vaccine expresses viral antigens inside the lettuce and spinach plants. Their goal is to deliver the spike proteins to the human body without altering the protein synthesis of human cells. The current vaccine supply must be kept refrigerated at extremely low temperatures. If this research effort can demonstrate the delivery of spike proteins throughout the food supply, the current vaccine supply could be scrapped in favor of a new paradigm of food-based vaccination. This experiment could forever alter the food supply, turning healthy, healing foods into bio-warfare playgrounds that globalists can use to exploit the human race.

(In NANOTECHNOLOGY.NEWS)

Experts warn that UN failure to ban slaughterbots could spell the end of humanity

Written by Cassie B.

See here

Experts in military strategy and artificial intelligence are raising the alarm after a UN conference did not reach an agreement on banning the use of so-called slaughterbots at a recent meeting in Geneva.

Slaughterbots is the name that has been given to weapons that can select and apply force to targets without using any human intervention. These weapons make their decisions using a series of algorithms in artificial intelligence software. Capable of hunting and striking targets without any input from controllers, their technology is growing so fast that many fear societies and governments have not taken the time to fully consider the dangers.

This year, for the first time, most of the 125 nations in the UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons called for new laws governing the killer robots. However, some countries opposed the measure, such as the U.S. and Russia, both of whom are known to be working on developing such weapons. Other nations that objected included India, Australia and the UK, with some arguing that continuing the development of these killer robots is vital to avoid having a strategic disadvantage.

The leader of the Future of Life Institute’s advocacy program on autonomous weapons, Emilia Javorsky, called the group’s failure to reach an agreement an “epic failure.”

She added: “It is now blatantly clear this forum — whose unanimity requirement makes it easily derailed by any state with a vested interest — is utterly incapable of taking seriously, let alone meaningfully addressing, the urgent threats posed by emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence.”

Unfortunately, time appears to be running out as slaughterbots are already being used in some places on the battlefield. For example, a UN report published this spring showed that STM Kargu drones have been used in the Libyan civil war. These small, portable rotary wing attack drones have precision strike capabilities and were used to hunt down soldiers who were retreating.

The companies that are developing the drones are working on AI systems that will be able to find a human target’s thermal signature or even identify people’s faces using a camera. However, they seem to lack some of the accuracy needed to make the distinction between a combatant and a non-combatant.

These weapons could be easy for anyone to obtain

The STM drones are among the most worrying for many officials, not least because of their resemblance to a normal consumer drone. They are fairly inexpensive, easy to mass produce, and can be equipped with guns. Some experts have warned that this accessibility means that gangs and other criminals could try to use them.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Professor Max Tegmark believes we’re headed for the “worst possible outcome.” He said: “That’s going to be the weapon of choice for basically anyone who wants to kill anyone. A slaughterbot would basically be able to anonymously assassinate anybody who’s pissed off anybody.”

Tegmark told The Sun some of the ways this technology could be used. For example, he pointed out that if slaughterbots cost the same as AK-47s, drug cartels would use the bots to evade getting caught when they kill people. He also said that a judge with lots of bodyguards could still be killed by one of these if it was flown into their bedroom window while they were sleeping.

Macalester College Professor James Dawes said: “It is a world where the sort of unavoidable algorithmic errors that plague even tech giants like Amazon and Google can now lead to the elimination of whole cities.”

“The world should not repeat the catastrophic mistakes of the nuclear arms race. It should not sleepwalk into dystopia,” he added.

There’s no way it can end well when you let machines that are prone to unpredictable errors make their own decisions about who to kill. If these artificial intelligence weapons were to be equipped with chemical, biological or nuclear warheads, they could even wipe out humanity.

(In ROBOT.NEWS)

See here 

Facebook is building an AI that can see, hear and learn like humans… and it will no doubt be used to ENSLAVE humanity

Written by Arsenio Toledo

Facebook recently announced a research project that aims to build an artificial intelligence (AI) capable of understanding the world like human beings.

The company’s AI project is called “Ego4D.” It involves a consortium of researchers from 13 labs and universities in nine countries. The project hopes to create an AI that can “understand and interact with the world like we do” in first-person. To do this, the company is planning to use a constant stream of video and audio from people’s lives.

“AI typically learns from photos and videos captured in third-person, but next-generation AI will need to learn from videos that show the world from the center of action,” says the company during its announcement of the project. “AI that understands the world from this point of view could unlock a new era of immersive experiences.”

Kristen Grauman, Facebook’s lead AI research scientist, says: “Next-generation AI systems will need to learn from an entirely different kind of data – videos that show the world from the center of the action, rather than the sidelines.” (Related: Facebook’s AI robots will destroy the entire human race if not stopped.)

AI being taught using over 3,000 hours of first-person video footage

To teach the new AI how to perceive the world from the vantage point of a human, the Ego4D project gathered over 3,000 hours worth of first-person video from around 850 project participants in nine different countries.

Participants have taken the first-person video by wearing GoPro cameras and augmented reality glasses. They have recorded themselves accomplishing various tasks as they went about their daily lives.

The footage is supplemented by an additional 400 hours of first-person video captured by Facebook Reality Labs Research using test subjects who were wearing augmented reality smart glasses in staged environments.

See here

The AI is then tasked with learning five key benchmark tasks from these 3,400 hours of footage.

The first is “episodic memory.” The AI needs to learn how to tie specific events to the correct time and location that they happened and to be able to recall them when asked.

The second benchmark is “forecasting.” The AI has to learn how to predict human actions and to try to anticipate human needs.

The third is “social interaction.” The intricacies of socialization are innate to the human experience, but no AI system anywhere in the world can properly understand it. The AI must be the first to learn how to understand it.

The fourth is “hand and object manipulation.” The AI must learn how to manipulate hands to learn new skills.

The last benchmark is “audio-visual diarization.” The AI needs to keep a “video diary” of clips and audio and must be able to tie them to specific locations and times.

No AI system anywhere in the world can perform all five of the tasks listed above. Facebook hopes this new AI can help people recall critical information, locate objects and accomplish tasks better and quicker.

“Ego4D makes it possible for AI to gain knowledge rooted in the physical and social world, gleaned through the first-person perspective of the people who live in it,” says Grauman. “Not only will AI start to understand the world around it better, it could one day be personalized at an individual level – it could know your favorite coffee mug or guide your itinerary for your next family trip.”

“This will allow AI systems to help you in ways that are really in the moment, contextual with what you’re doing and what you’ve seen before, all in ways you just can’t do now,” Grauman adds.

(In ROBOT.NEWS)

See here